Showing posts with label Flood Insurance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Flood Insurance. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

THE CASE AGAINST LYNN JENKINS CHAPTER 33 - SHE'S A SHILL FOR THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY


This is Lynn Jenkins, she does not represent us

Five years ago America's Gulf Coast faced Hurricane Katrina, one the five deadliest storms and the costliest natural disaster the nation has ever known. We all remember the immediate aftermath of that storm. The suffering in the streets of New Orleans and the chaos at the Superdome are permanently etched in our memories.


Hurricane Katrina

What we ignore and tend to forget is that thousands and thousands of homes were battered by hurricane force winds for hours before any storm surge finished them off. That means that thousands and thousands of homeowners and their families with adequate, or more than adequate, insurance expected their homeowner's insurance policies to make good on their losses.


Insurance Claims were Denied

Didn't happen. Katrina left us with a prime example of what I mean when I say that corporations don't have a butt to kick or a soul to save. The insurance adjusters claimed the loss came by water not from the wind. Why is that important? A water loss is a flood loss and the taxpayers pick up the tab. A wind loss is a covered hazard and the insurance company picks up the tab.


Representative Gene Taylor [D -Ms] at podium

Bottom line, the insurance industry refused to pay what they owed. Then, State by State, they pulled their business lines out of the Gulf Coast States. Here's an example provided by Mississippi's Democratic Representative from the floor of the House during consideration of H.R. 1264, the MULTIPLE PERIL INSURANCE ACT OF 2009:


Madam Speaker, if I was a shill for the insurance industry, and apparently we have our share on the floor today, I would do everything but talk about what the insurance industry did to south Mississippi after Hurricane Katrina. I would forget, if I was a member of the Rules Committee, the 12 years that they controlled the floor of the House of Representatives, the 12 years that they could have cut the Amtrak subsidy had they wanted to, but they didn't.



So let's get back to what we are going to talk about today. And, again, I thank the leadership for bringing this to the floor.



If you had visited south Mississippi in August of late 2005, gone to a little town called Bay St. Louis, you could have driven down the street and seen this house. It belonged to some folks named Corky and Molly Hadden. On August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina hit south Mississippi. So the Haddens left this because their Nation warned them that a bad storm was coming, and came home to this.



Corky is a financial manager; he is a smart guy. He had lot of insurance, he thought. As a matter of fact, Corky had $650,000 worth of insurance on that house. The problem was under the rules of the National Flood Insurance Program that Mr. Sessions agrees needs changing, and I am trying to change today, we paid the private sector, State Farm, All State, Nationwide, we pay them to sell the policy; they get a premium. We pay them to adjust the claim.



The problem is no one bothered to think that wait a minute, we are letting that claims adjuster decide he is playing God. He can say the wind did it, which means his company has to pay, State Farm, Nationwide or All State; or he can say the water did it, which means the taxpayers have to pay.



You are right, Mr. Sessions, we should not have paid that $18 billion. The reason we paid that $18 billion is a bad set of rules that allowed companies like State Farm, All State, Nationwide to stick the taxpayers with their bills. So 18 months after this event, Mr. Hadden, who had $650,000 worth of insurance on that nice house, was paid nothing by his insurer, State Farm Insurance Company.



Again, if you are a defender of the insurance industry, if they are helping you with your campaigns, you sure as heck don't want to talk about that, do you?



The next house, if you had gone a little bit further down the same street, you would have seen one of the oldest houses in Bay St. Louis, built around 1800. So from 1800 to 2005, no telling how many hurricanes it survived. It belonged to the Benvenutti family, a pretty old house.



This is what it looked like when they left because their Nation told them to get the heck out of there, there is a bad storm coming. Let's see what they came home to. This is what they came home to.



You know, for most people, including Mississippians, your house is your biggest investment. It is, to a large extent, an extension of yourself. So the Benvenuttis, realizing that that house meant a lot to them, had a lot of insurance, or so they thought, $586,000. When they filed their claim, for almost 24 months they were paid nothing on their wind insurance.



Now why is this significant? Well, NOAA, the Navy Oceanographic Lab and others went back and looked at the events that were called Hurricane Katrina, and NOAA tells us that for 4 hours before the storm surge arrived in south Mississippi, that house, the house before it, was subjected to hurricane-force winds for 4 hours before the water ever got there. Yet the insurance companies wanted to turn around and blame everything on the water. Why?



Because they could stick the taxpayers with the bill.



The next house is a more typical home, more modest home. This one is about a mile inland, about a mile inland, pretty good ways from the water. Beautiful home. This is what the folks who lived there, when they left, looked at last.



This is what they came home to.



It's not just three houses; it's not 30 houses. It was 30,000 houses that this happened to. So, again, these folks, knowing this was a big part of their lives, had $249,000 worth of insurance. Their insurance company was slightly more generous than the previous two times and offered them $10,000.



Now, Mr. Sessions points out that, incorrectly, that maybe government shouldn't be doing this. Well, maybe he doesn't talk to his folks in his State capital often enough because if he had he would know that his State is already doing this.



In the aftermath of Katrina, on a State-by-State basis, the insurance industry pulled out, left a vacuum. People had to have some form of wind insurance; and so on a State-by-State basis, the State picked up that obligation.

The Republican Minority is playing a shell game. They inherited a budget surplus from former Democratic President Bill Clinton. They and Republican President George Bush ran up record deficits, waged two wars off the books, gave the richest Americans huge tax breaks, and removed critical financial regulations leading to the worst economic meltdown since the Great Depression. Now these same wastrels who squandered the budget surplus have misspent these past two years obstructing the Economic Recovery and serving the interests of Wall Street, Big Banks, and the Insurance Lobby.

H.R. 1264, the MULTIPLE PERIL INSURANCE ACT OF 2009 passed the house on roll call 466, by a margin of 228 to 183. Lynn Jenkins, champion of Fat Cats, Big Banks, Insurance Companies & people so rich they have more dollars than sense again showed her true colors by voting against regular people.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

THE CASE AGAINST LYNN JENKINS - CHAPTER 29 SHE'S AGAINST FLOOD INSURANCE


This is Lynn Jenkins, she does not represent us

The House of Representatives passed H.R. 5114, the Flood Insurance Reform Priorities Act in roll call 447 by a vote of 329 to 90. Lynn Jenkins, of course, voted no.  Details about H.R. 5114 were posted on this blog July 13th.


Arizona Republican Jeff Flake

Arizona's Republican Representative Jeff Flake introduced an Amendment mandating that no funds made available for grants under this bill may be used for earmarks. That Amendment passed 423 to 3.


New York Democrat Scott Murphy

New York's Democratic Representative Scott Murphy offered an Amendment requiring all funds authorized under the Act to be expended in a manner consistent with the manual on Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch. The Murphy Amendment passed 421 to 0.

This bill represents a major revamp of the Flood Insurance Program. The large margin of victory was driven by the fact that from A to Z this bill was driven by constituent concerns about improving Flood Insurance and making it more workable.

The trend continues, if government can do something to respond to the plight of ordinary people Lynn Jenkins is against it. Lynn Jenkins likes to tell us of her financial planning expertise. Really? Would you take financial planning advise from a person who tells you not to protect your assets through insurance? And neither would I. When it comes to flood insurance there is only one game in town. Lynn Jenkins just voted to let you and yours float downstream.

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

TELEWORKING AND FLOOD INSURANCE UP NEXT ON THE HOUSE'S AGENDA

Congress heads back to work this week with two bills emerging from the Rules Committee. H.R. 1722, the Teleworks Improvement Act of 2010, was introduced by Maryland's Democratic Representative John Sarbanes.

This bill expands the options for Federal workers to work from home. Currently, the Washington Post reports, only 10% of government employees use the option. Rather than shut down government when severe weather strikes, and that's not rare in D.C., offices can stay open remotely. According to Sarbanes, the Washington Post said, the government saved about $30 Million dollars a day last year when remote workers were able to do their jobs, despite D.C. being paralyzed by a February blizzard. Lynn Jenkins voted against the bill.

The Rules Committee is scheduled to take up H.R. 1722 at 5:00 p.m. today. When the bill emerges from the Rules Committee it takes its second journey to the floor of the House of Representatives. It failed to garner a 2/3 majority vote back on May 6th, although it clearly had a majority. The tally on roll call 251 was 268 yeas to 147 nays. The supermajority of 66% was required because H.R. 1722 advanced via Rule XV:

RULE XV
BUSINESS IN ORDER ON SPECIAL DAYS
Suspensions
1. (a) A rule may not be suspended except by a vote of two-thirds of the Members voting, a quorum being present. The Speaker may not entertain a motion that the House suspend the rules except on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays and during the last six days of a session of Congress.
When H.R. 1722 returns to the floor it will be under a Rule which will require only a simple majority. H.R. 1722 can and will save taxpayers far more than it will cost, it keeps the wheels moving when offices would otherwise have to close, and it will attract more workers to civil service. This bill makes sense.

H.R. 5114, is the Flood Insurance Priorities Act of 2010. This bill was introduced by California's Democratic Representative Maxine Waters. This bill amends the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 [NIFA] extending the National Flood Insurance Program and the Pilot Program for Mitigation of Severe Repetitive Loss Properties.

H.R. 5114 increases the maximum aggregate amount of insurance coverage for residential and nonresidential building. The bill amends the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (FDPA) to delay, for a five-year period, the effective date for the mandatory purchase of flood insurance for certain new flood hazard areas not previously designated as having special flood hazards (with "100-year floodplains").

NIFA is amended to set forth a five-year phase-in of flood insurance rates for newly mapped areas not previously designated as having special flood hazards.

Employing sound business like practices H.R. 5114 directs the FEMA Administrator to implement this Act in a manner that will not materially weaken the financial position of the national flood insurance program or increase the risk of financial liability to federal taxpayers.

It helps people get covered immediately by waiving the 30-day delay (waiting period) for the effective date of flood insurance contracts when the initial purchase of flood insurance coverage is connected with the purchase or other transfer of the property to be covered, regardless of whether a loan is involved in the purchase or transfer transaction. Limits such waiver, however, to instances when the initial purchase of coverage is made within 30 days after the purchase or other transfer of the property.

Revises the current waiver of the 30-day waiting period for the initial purchase of flood insurance coverage in connection with the making, increasing, extension, or renewal of a loan to limit it to instances when the purchase is made within 30 days after the loan transaction.

Not only the wealthy need apply, this is a plan available to the poor. It requires flood insurance regulations to permit certain low-income policyholders (families whose income level is at or below 200% of the poverty line) to pay insurance premiums in monthly installments.

The bill has teeth. FDPA is amended to subject lenders to civil monetary penalties for requiring, in connection with any loan, the purchase of flood insurance coverage under NIFA, or for purchasing such coverage, in an amount exceeding the minimum mandatory amount.

Increases from $350 to $2,000 the maximum civil monetary penalty per violation against a regulated lending institution or enterprise. Increases from $100,000 to $1 million the total amount of such penalties assessed against any single regulated lending institution or enterprise during any calendar year, unless the total of such penalties in any three (or more) of the immediately preceding five calendar years was $1 million (in which case there is no limit).

Yet it is fair because it prohibits imposition of any civil penalty on a regulated lending institution or enterprise that has made a good faith effort to comply with FDPA requirements or for any non-material violation of such requirements.

Finally, this legislation is forward looking. H.R. 5114 amends FDPA to subject lenders to civil monetary penalties for requiring, in connection with any loan, the purchase of flood insurance coverage under NIFA, or for purchasing such coverage, in an amount exceeding the minimum mandatory amount.

Increases from $350 to $2,000 the maximum civil monetary penalty per violation against a regulated lending institution or enterprise. Increases from $100,000 to $1 million the total amount of such penalties assessed against any single regulated lending institution or enterprise during any calendar year, unless the total of such penalties in any three (or more) of the immediately preceding five calendar years was $1 million (in which case there is no limit).

Prohibits imposition of any civil penalty on a regulated lending institution or enterprise that has made a good faith effort to comply with FDPA requirements or for any non-material violation of such requirements.

The Rules Committee meets tomorrow to consider H.R. 5114.