Showing posts with label H.R. 4626. Show all posts
Showing posts with label H.R. 4626. Show all posts

Friday, October 1, 2010

THE CASE AGAINST LYNN JENKINS CHAPTER 40 - HER RECORD ON MEDICARE

This is Lynn Jenkins, she does not represent us

Site Meters tells this blog of a recent visitor from Clifton, Kansas who was interested in Lynn Jenkins record on Medicare. That's a great inquiry, so let's take a look.

House Concurrent Resolution 85 established the Congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2010 and including appropriate budgetary levels for F.Y. 2009 and for F.Y. 2011 through 2014. So what's that got to do with Medicare?

Section 314of the resolution establishes the current policy reserve fund for Medicare improvements. That's important because this §314 is an essential component of reforming the Medicare payment formula. This section mandates changes incentives to encourage efficiency and higher quality care in a way that supports fiscal sustainability. It calls for improving payment accuracy to encourage efficient use of resources and ensure that primary care receives appropriate compensation. It requires improvement of coordination of care among all providers serving a patient in all appropriate settings. Finally it seeks to hold providers accountable for their utilization patterns and quality of care. Lynn Jenkins voted no on H.Con.Res. 85 on roll call vote 192, April 2, 2009.

H.R. 3962 the Preservation of Access to Care for Medicare Beneficiaries and Pension Relief Act of 2010, is now Public Law 111-192. This new law provides for a Medicare physician payment rate update and provides single and multiple employer pension plan sponsors with relief from pension funding requirements.

Lynn Jenkins voted no on H.R. 3962 on roll call vote 887, November 7, 2003. She voted yes on the measure roll call vote 393, June 24, 2010. That was on resolving differences with the Senate version of the bill. The final vote was 417 to 1.

Another case of where Lynn Jenkins was against it before she was for it is H.R. 3961, the Medicare Physician Payment Reform Act of 2009 , now Public Law 111-141. On original passage in the House Lynn Jenkins voted against H.R. 3961, that was roll call vote 909 on November 19, 2009. When it came to resolving differences with the Senate, she was again on board. The final margin was 315 to 97, on roll call vote 67, February 27, 2009.

H.R. 2, the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009, now Public Law 111-3, is more commonly known as SCHIP, This is the part of Medicare that provides for health insurance for the neediest children. This law expanded coverage to include all children whose families were at or below 300% of the poverty line, up from 200%. Lynn Jenkins voted no on H.R. 2 first on roll call vote 16, January 14,2009; then again on roll call vote 50, February 4, 2009. Jenkins argued that the top third of those children should be excluded. Talk about throwing out the baby with the bath water!

H.R. 598,was a bill to provide for a portion of the economic recovery package relating to revenue measures, unemployment, and health, which became Public Law 111-5 on 2/17/2009, and is known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. This applies to Medicare because this is where incentives are provided to physicians and hospitals using the electronic health record (EHR) and reduce payments to those who continue using paper. This EHR is using technology to reduce overhead costs in the administration of Medicare. H.R. 598 became Title IV of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Lynn Jenkins voted no Public Law 111-5, first on roll call vote 46, January 28, 2009 and then on roll call vote 70 on February 13, 2009.

H.R. 4691, The Temporary Extension Act of 2010, now Public Law 111-144, made technical corrections to Medicare physician payment update, by delaying the increase to physicians by a month. The bill also extended the Medicare therapy caps exceptions process by three months. This measure passed the House by a voice vote.

The bottom line on Lynn Jenkins is that she voted to obstruct Medicare until the final vote. She voted to deny health insurance coverage to America's neediest children. She voted against modernizing Medicare when she voted against the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

But there is more. The shameful propaganda in which she claimed that Health Care Reform would slash $500 Billion from Medicare, as though seniors would see a half a trillion dollar cut in benefits from Medicare. That wasn't the case. As reported on this blog Wednesday June 30th, That money is a reduction in the growth of future spending over t0 years. That money will not have to be spent because advancements in technology and elimination of waste and fraud.

Lynn Jenkins voted against Health Care Reform. If you are a senior looking at that doughnut hole then you were probably glad to see that $250 supplemental check this summer to help you through the hole. Don't thank Lynn Jenkins, she voted against it.

Lynn Jenkins likes to say how health care could be done correctly. Her votes tell us she speaking with a forked tongue. Lynn Jenkins was one of only 19 Representatives who voted against eliminating the anti-trust exemption for Health Insurance Companies.

When it comes to Medicare, Lynn Jenkins stirs the pot but comes up with last minute votes that lets her say supported the program. She's got a harder time with Veterans. Remember she voted against the National Defense Authorization Act, H.R. 5136, which languishes in the Senate.




Friday, June 18, 2010

THE CASE AGAINST LYNN JENKINS CHAPTER 11 - AGAIN SHE'S A "NO-GO" ON PAYGO & VOTES TO LET HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES ENGAGE IN ANTI COMPETITIVE BUSINESS PRACTICES


This is Lynn Jenkins, she does not represent us

H. J. Res. 45, THE STATUTORY PAY-AS-YOU-GO ACT of 2010 became Public Law 111-139. The purpose of the resolution was to reestablish a statutory procedure to enforce a rule of budget neutrality on new revenue and direct spending legislation.

For an excellent thumbnail of PAYGO jump over to Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAYGO. Wikipedia makes the point that "[t]he goal of [PAYGO] is to require those in control of the budget to engage in the diligence of prioritizing expenses and exercising fiscal restraint."

One feature of H. J. Res. 45 is Title II dealing with elimination of duplicative and wasteful spending. This title requires the Comptroller General to; " (1) conduct routine investigations to identify programs, agencies, offices, and initiatives with duplicative goals and activities within Departments and government-wide; and (2) report annually to Congress on the findings, including the cost of such duplication, and with recommendations for consolidation and elimination to reduce duplication identifying specific rescissions."

So obviously Republicans want those in charge of governmental spending to engage in the due diligence, prioritize expenses, and exercise fiscal restraint. Well not so fast, Lynn Jenkins and the Party of No were NO GO ON PAYGO. She voted against H. J. Res. 45, against PAYGO, and against eliminating duplicative wasteful spending. That was roll call number 48 in the second session of the 111th Congress.

Positioning herself steadfastly with Insurance Companies, Lynn Jenkins was one of only nineteen in the Congress to vote against H.R. 4626, the HEALTH INSURANCE INDUSTRY FAIR COMPETITION Act. This bill Health Insurance Industry Fair Competition Act - Amends the McCarran-Ferguson Act to provide that nothing in that Act shall modify, impair, or supersede the operation of any of the antitrust laws with respect to the business of health insurance. H.R. 4626 also applies prohibitions against using unfair methods of competition to the business of health insurance without regard to whether such business is carried on for profit.

So let's not forget the propaganda campaign the Insurance Companies waged in fighting Health Care Reform.


Lynn Jenkins voted to keep the Antitrust Exemption for Health Insurance Companies

If you recall antitrust laws prohibit things like monopolies, restraint of trade, collusion among businesses, and cartels. Antitrust exemption takes away those prohibitions. Health Insurance Companies abused their exemption by jacking up rates and denying claims. These companies did not operate in the public interest. Even the majority of House Republicans saw it that way. On roll call 64 the House voted to strip the exemption of antitrust laws from Health Insurance Companies. Again Jenkins sides with the Fat Cats. 

Over her career in Congress, the 2008 race and the 2010 cycle, Lynn Jenkins has taken more than  $82,074 from Insurance Companies according to OpenSecrets.org http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/industries.php?cycle=Career&cid=N00029077&type=I.